ICON57

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6373434819396894720

The Tech Bubble Didn’t Burst This Year. Just Wait The industry has splintered into a few sure bets and everything else. That isn’t helping guide us out of the iPhone era into whatever’s next.

Things were different in Silicon Valley in the distant year of 2012, when iPhone sales were skyrocketing and you could still buy a house in Palo Alto for less than $2 million. Back then, most restaurants had menus, not tasting menus. Chief executive officers could say something grandiose at a tech conference without worrying about getting mocked on HBO six months later by the Beavis and Butt-head guy. And a talented entrepreneur could walk into a venture capitalist’s office, say his startup was a mobile-first solution for pretty much any problem (payments! photos! blogging!), and walk out with a good-size seed investment. “That pitch was enough to get going,” says Roelof Botha, a partner with VC firm Sequoia Capital. “It’s not enough anymore.”

Read the rest of Bloomberg Businessweek's The Year Ahead in Tech.

Botha should know. Over the past five years he’s been one of Silicon Valley’s most successful investors, thanks to early bets on such companies as Instagram, Tumblr, and Square, all successes owed to the mass adoption of smartphones. Now, though, smartphone growth rates are near zero in the U.S. and falling around the world. And while there are candidates to succeed the iPhone as the next revolutionary computing platform (wearable gadgets, virtual reality), none has made a compelling must-have argument to the mainstream.
That means fewer opportunities for entrepreneurs, at least in the short term. The Bloomberg U.S. Startups Barometer—an index that considers capital raised and number of deals, first financings, and successful acquisitions or initial public offerings—remains high by historical standards but has fallen 21 percent since November 2015.
Earlier this year, One Kings Lane, the online home goods retailer once worth almost $1 billion, sold itself to Bed Bath & Beyond, one of the companies it was supposed to displace, for just $12 million. Jawbone, the maker of sleek wearable fitness hardware once seen as a threat to Apple’s, has seen its value fall 50 percent. Since 2015, researcher CB Insights has counted 80 “down rounds,” instances of a startup accepting a reduced valuation to raise more venture funding. “There was this fog hanging over Silicon Valley in 2001,” says Botha, referring to the last big tech bust. “And there’s a fog hanging over it now. There’s no underlying wave of growth.”

আশ্চর্য জনক ড্রামা না দেখলে বুঝতেই পারবেন না। দেখুন তাহলে কি ঘটে। This is the real drama. seen you and your friend. Enjoy the drama very much. So always Show the drama.

The GOP presidential nominee is out on the trail ahead of the general election in November.

View Photos

 

Even as the country recoils, justifiably, from the prospect of Donald Trump threatening not to respect the election results, let us not lose sight of the mounting evidence of Trump’s mistreatment of women — and his offensive debate dismissal of their claims.

At the second debate, Trump claimed that his taped boasting about grabbing women without consent was just that — all talk, no action. In the 10 days before the third debate, nine women came forward to dispute that assertion.
So moderator Chris Wallace posed the key question: “Why would so many different women from so many different circumstances over so many different years . . . all make up these stories?”
Trump’s response was a characteristically repulsive stew of dishonesty, outright lies, conspiracy theorizing and blame-shifting.
Dishonesty: ,” he said. Wrong. Actually, additional corroboration has emerg nominee Donald Trump spent part of his Oct. 14 rally addressing sexual assault accusations, which he denied and condemnLies: “I did not say that,” Trump insisted, three times, after Hillary Clinton noted that part of Trump’s argument for his innocence was that the women weren’t attractive enough to merit his unwanted attention. Just go to the videotape.
Conspiracy theorizing:

If You’re Ever Dissed in a Hacked Email, Try to Respond Like Larry Lessig He was also, in the view of the Clinton campaign,

A classy individual. Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Lawrence Lessig is a professor at Harvard Law School, a leading advocate for campaign finance reform, and short-lived presidential candidate.

He was also, in the view of the Clinton campaign, circa August 2015, a “smug,” “pompous,” loathsome guy whom a reasonable person might wish “to kick the shit out of on Twitter.”

A New Kind of Spy How China obtains American technological secrets.

Greg Chung was eager to help China. “He has a big heart,” his wife said. Family Photograph Courtesy FBI

Greg Chung was at home on February 1, 2003, when the space shuttle Columbia fell from the sky. His son Jeffrey called to tell him the news: the ship had broken apart while returning to Earth, and all seven astronauts on board had died. “That’s not a good joke to make,” Chung said. An American citizen who was born in China, Chung lived with his wife, Ling, on a cul-de-sac in Orange, California. Until his retirement, a few months earlier, he had worked on NASA’s space-shuttle program. Among other things, he had helped to design the Columbia’s crew cabin. When he realized that Jeffrey was telling the truth, he hung up the phone and wept.

In 1972, NASA outsourced the design and development of its space shuttles to the Rockwell Corporation, which was later acquired by Boeing. For three decades, Chung was a structural engineer in the stress-analysis group. The work was repetitive, but he was well suited to it. He rarely left his office, even for coffee; instead, he sat at his desk, running computer models that predicted how the fuselage would hold up under various intensities of heat and pressure.

After the Columbia accident, NASA asked Boeing to improve the design of the next shuttle. Chung had been one of the best analysts in his group, and his former supervisor called to hire him back as a subcontractor. Though he was seventy, he was glad to postpone retirement. He returned to his former habits, coming home late for dinner and then working until midnight. He was driven not by the prospect of a promotion or a raise but by the pleasure of the work. “He’d tell me how much money he had saved for Boeing,” Ling told me later. “I always teased him: ‘your Boeing, your Boeing.’ “

In April, 2006, two F.B.I. agents visited Chung at home. He had designed the house in Orange, and it included a deck that he and Ling had built themselves. In the large front yard, Chung had planted lemon trees and a tomato patch, which he sprinkled with water recycled from the shower. Their two sons—Jeffrey and his older brother, Shane—lived nearby with their families.

Chung, a tall man with a lean, impassive face, invited the agents inside. They asked him about Chi Mak, an acquaintance of Chung’s, who had been arrested several months earlier. Mak had moved to California from Hong Kong in the seventies, and had worked as an engineer at Power Paragon, a company that builds power-distribution systems for the Navy. For years, China had been trying to modernize its naval fleet, and the F.B.I. suspected that Mak had been trained by Chinese intelligence services and sent to the United States as a spy.

Ivanka Trump has a great deal at stake in terms of reputation and personal ambition in her father’s flame-throwing final stand. PHOTOGRAPH BY PATRICK T. FALLON / BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES

Ivanka Trump has a great deal at stake in terms of reputation and personal ambition in her father’s flame-throwing final stand. PHOTOGRAPH BY PATRICK T. FALLON / BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES

“I hate the word ‘surrogate.’ What does that mean?” Ivanka Trump said on a stage on Wednesday morning at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Laguna Niguel, California. “At one point, major newspapers were writing that I was running to be a Vice-Presidential candidate. I’m, like, ‘No, I’m a daughter. I don’t express my views on policy, with one exception.’ “ That exception, she said, was affordable child care, and she proudly took responsibility for employing her daughterly influence to convince her father, Donald Trump, to incorporate a child-care tax deduction and dependent-care saving accounts into his policy platform, because matters affecting working women were “very core to her professional mission.” Still, she insisted, “I’m not a surrogate. I’m a daughter.”

Ivanka was appearing at the Fortune Most Powerful Women conference, an annual gathering of some of the most accomplished women in corporate America. She had spoken at the conference before, but this year the stop took on an obviously larger significance. Rather than simply reaffirming her celebrity presence among the female entrepreneurs and C.E.O.s of Fortune 500 companies in attendance, Ivanka was trying to salvage her brand, which is built around young professional women and working mothers, two groups who appear to be recoiling from her father’s Presidential candidacy in large numbers.

The Unpleasant Truth About Chinese Espionage Thanks to weak American counterintelligence and limited public awareness, the risk to Beijing is low while the rewards can be high

Women on the streets of Beijing. (Photo: Fred Dufour/AFP/Getty Images)

Chinese espionage against the United States is in the news again. Recently in this column I explained the sensational case of Edward Lin, the Taiwanese immigrant turned U.S. Navy officer who stands accused of committing espionage against his adopted homeland. This story raises many troubling questions about the dismal state of security in our navy, which seems unable to keep secrets anymore.
Although the navy is staying tight-lipped about Lieutenant Commander Lin, it’s already evident that the damage he perpetrated—thanks to his high-level access to some of the navy’s best-guarded secrets—is daunting. Damning, too, is the news that Mr. Lin was arrested while boarding a flight bound for China, the beneficiary of his alleged betrayal. No wonder top admirals want to keep as much of his impending trial classified as possible, to prevent public discussion of how much damage this traitor wrought on our national security.
Yet this is no isolated incident. In the two weeks since the Lin story broke, we have still more cases of Chinese immigrants accused of spying against their adopted country on behalf of their ancestral one. Szuhsiung “Allen” Ho, a Chinese immigrant and naturalized American, faces a raft of charges for running an espionage ring aimed at stealing nuclear secrets for Beijing. According to the Federal indictment, at the direction of a Chinese state-owned nuclear power company Mr. Ho recruited a half-dozen engineers to get nuclear secrets that Beijing wanted but could not obtain legally from the United States.

India can only "bark" about trade deficit: Chinese media

 New Delhi     Last Updated: October 19, 2016  | 00:00 IST

Photo: Reuters

An article in China's state-owned newspaper The Global Times has said New Delhi can only "bark" about the growing trade deficit between the two countries and do nothing. The article comes in the backdrop of growing clamour for boycott of Chinese products on Indian social media platforms.

Journalist donors favor Clinton over Trump by more than

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton shake hands at the end of their first presidential debate. (Mike Segar/Reuters)

Expect to hear this statistic cropping up from some mass rally in the near future: People who identify as journalists on federal campaign finance reports overwhelmingly donated to the Clinton campaign over the Trump campaign. The margin is 430 journalists combining to give $382,000 to Clinton, as opposed to 50 journalists combining to give $14,000 to Trump, according to an.

Look for bargains at your local farmers market.They start to slash prices then since they want to get rid of their extra produce.”

jnicolemarshall / Via 

“Go to the farmers market whenever possible! Most of your fruits or veggies will be half the price.”

“Go to the farmers market when it’s about to close on the last day. They start to slash prices then since they want to get rid of their extra produce.”

If you’re single and want to buy in bulk, share a Cotsco membership with some friends.

triumph_chick / Via instagram.com

“Go in with a few friends for a Costco membership. You can all go together, and buy in bulk for everyone. I’ve done it a few times, and it’s totally worth it.”
—Emily Ash, Facebook

“Get a group to get a membership together and buy things in bulk. You can portion everything, use a little at a time, and freeze the rest. It’s slightly more expensive up front but when you don’t have to buy meat for a few months, it’s really worth it!”
—Larissa Norris Taylor, Facebook

“Buy vegetables when they are in season, on sale, and look super fresh. Use what you can and prep the rest.

Buy seasonal produce.

producerkeli / Via 

“Buy vegetables when they are in season, on sale, and look super fresh. Use what you can and prep the rest. I freeze pepper and onion strips for fajitas, steaks, and sausage sandwiches. The taste is no different than using them fresh. Not all veggies are freezer-friendly so this isn’t a one-size-fits-all thing, but it is very helpful!”
—Caroline Gustke, Facebook

The snake is very Dangerus flying in the sky, None bleveded. But bleaved this/সাপ আকাশে উড়ে অনেক শুনেছেন, আজ ভিডিওটিতে দেখুন সাপ কিভাবে আকাশে উড়ে !

Wonderfull animal for this world. just our intersting and injoing subjects. so we are alaws happy.

Mother hi, Mother

https://web.facebook.com/100012657993573/videos/173993176365948/

Don’t Wait Until After the Meeting to Start Your Action Items

• April 28th, 2016

Julie was expecting Bruce to arrive at her office in five minutes. He would no doubt want input on the draft memo he’d sent yesterday—only she’d hadn’t found time to read it yet. She knew he also wanted to discuss partnering with a new research group that colleagues had already used, but their requests for reviews on the work had so far gone unanswered. And she was keen to hear how Bruce had felt about leading a recent workshop, which she’d encouraged him to do but been unable to attend. So goes the manager’s punch list for check-ins with direct reports.
With the clock ticking, what could Julie do? Scan the memo? Follow up with the colleagues? Watch a video of the workshop on the company intranet or read the survey feedback?
If this sort of time crunch sounds familiar, you are not alone. It wasn’t long after becoming a manager that I found I had landed on a seemingly endless treadmill of meetings. I was participating in so many that I barely had time to prep, let alone tackle the to-do lists I was taking away.

Meetings

So I decided to try a different approach. What if meetings with one to a few employees became work sessions in which we could review memos together, Google up facts to suss out an idea, call colleagues with insight on relevant issues or bring in those who could benefit from the discussion? We might get through fewer items, but we’d have a much better chance of resolving those we did address, taking work off everyone’s plate.
A shift to what I call “just-do-it” meetings not only recovers hours and weeks of professional time to think about higher-level priorities, it can also create space to be more thoughtful in interactions with direct reports and to build stronger mentoring relationships with them.
Three tactics can help in the process. They are:

• “State of play” memos: Ask reports to email you a strategic agenda before you meet, so you can prioritize one or two areas to tackle during the meeting.
• Real-time investigation: When all that stands between you and your report making a decision is a piece of knowledge—e.g. a peer’s input or publicly available data— find that information during the meeting itself. You may still need some time to reflect, but in many cases, by removing the barriers, you’ll be able to act.
• Visiting hours (or minutes): Invite others who can learn from an agenda item to join just that part of the meeting

Let’s look at Julie’s dilemma again through a “just do it” lens. In the five minutes before Bruce arrives, she might think about which of the potential agenda items—the memo, the research group or the workshop—matters most to the organization, to her and to Bruce. She decides that the latter is probably top-of-mind for him; he’d been really worried about leading the session. The memo needs to go out tomorrow so that should also take high priority, but the decision on the research group is less time-sensitive.
When Bruce arrives, Julie first asks how the workshop went. He confesses that there were some bumps and expresses interest in some formal training in public speaking, so Julie fires off an email to HR to see if the company can cover a course. Next, they go through the memo together, thinking about the audience and objective and adjusting some language accordingly. With 10 minutes left, Julie and Bruce also call David, one of the people who has previously worked with the research group. Luckily, he’s at his desk and willing to chat on speakerphone for a few minutes about the experience. Since his report is resoundingly positive, Julie gives Bruce the go-ahead to solicit an estimate.
With every to-do already ticked off, she’s left with time to consider a board recommendation, read a competitor’s annual report, or start thinking about a strategic offsite that she needs to plan—that is, make progress on big-picture goals.
If you adopt a “just do it” mentality, you may be surprised by all that you and your colleagues, well, just do.

The Easiest Way to Get Rid of Racism? Just Redefine It.

• By Greg Howard,
• August 22nd, 2016

Credit Illustration by Pablo Delcan. Heart: Stocktrek Images, via Getty Images.

On its face, inviting a former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan onto your radio show is a risky proposition with very little upside. The situation gets even more precarious when you’re inviting this ex-wizard to dole out opinions on race. But these are wild times we’re living in, which is why David Duke — who has emerged as a top cheerleader for the Republican presidential nominee, Donald J. Trump — appeared on N.P.R.’s “Morning Edition” two weeks ago and defended the candidate from charges of racism.

The surprise was that Duke, now running for a Senate seat, actually had some perceptive things to say. The rising tide of buttoned-up Republicans who have spoken out against Trump’s ethnic belligerence, he said, were betraying both “the Republican Party and certainly conservatism.” He then managed to dismiss those Republicans and swiftly parse a complex national paradox. “These are just nothing more than epithets and vicious attacks,” Duke said. “Donald Trump is not a racist. And the truth is, in this country, if you simply defend the heritage of European-American people, then you’re automatically a racist. There’s massive racial discrimination against Euro­pean-Americans, and that’s the reality.”

In positioning Trump as the victim of a smear campaign, Duke was defending him against claims of deep, personal, cancer-of-the-soul racism. Trump isn’t racist, said the ex-Klan boss (who, of course, also isn’t racist), because he doesn’t harbor hate in his heart for America’s racial minorities. But then he pivoted. The real problem, he claimed, is systemic racism, directed against European-Americans.

This is how David Duke, who most diverges from the stereotypical Klansman in that he wears suits, revealed an understanding that systems of race are more important than one person’s motives, reputation or emotional health — that there is racism, and then there is racism, and the two are not the same.

The first cited use of “racism” in The Oxford English Dictionary comes from 1902, during the well-intentioned Lake Mohonk Conference of Friends of the Indian. There, a white man, Richard Henry Pratt, criticized government policy toward Native Americans. “Segregating any class or race of people apart from the rest of the people kills the progress of the segregated people or makes their growth very slow,” he said. “Association of races and classes is necessary to destroy racism and classism.” Pratt was what we might call “progressive” for his time; his version of destroying racism involved forcibly assimilating Native Americans into white culture. (As he put it, “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man.”) Both of these options — segregation by force or assimilation by force — had disastrous effects for Native Americans. But for Pratt, racism was a matter of policy, not malice.

“Racism” spent the first half of the 20th century in competition with an­other word, “racialism,” though neither featured prominently in our national conversation. Then came the civil rights era, when the word took on for many a convenient new meaning, one that had more to do with the human heart than with practices like redlining, gerrymandering or voter intimidation. In 1964, Gov. George Wallace of Alabama — who just a year earlier promised “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever” — explained the clear difference, in his mind, between a racist and a segregationist: “A racist is one who despises someone because of his color, and an Alabama segregationist is one who conscientiously believes that it is in the best interest of the Negro and white to have a separate educational and social order.”

Soon, nearly everyone could agree that racism was the evil work of people with hate in their hearts — bigots. This was a convenient thing for white Americans to believe. Racism, they could say, was the work of racists. And wherever you looked, there were no racists: only good men like Wallace, minding the welfare of their black fellow citizens, or the segregationist South Carolina senator Strom Thurmond, defending states’ rights. Racism definitely existed, at some point — no one was out there denying that slavery had happened — but its residue had settled only in the hearts of the most unsavory individuals. Society as a whole didn’t need reform for the sins of a few.

Racism ceased to be a matter of systems and policy and became a referendum on the rot of the individual soul. Calling people racist was no longer a matter of evaluating their opinions; it was an accusation of being irrevocably warped at the very core. We can see how this plays out in news coverage of things that are, in fact, racist. “Racist” is seen as such a deep personal attack that it’s safer and more civil — particularly in the eyes of mainstream media organizations — to refer to things as racially charged, or tinged, or explosive, or divisive, or (when all else fails) just plain racial.

In May, Trump made news by railing against Gonzalo Curiel, the Indiana-born Mexican-American federal judge presiding over litigation against Trump University. Trump called him “very hostile” and suggested that he recuse himself. “This judge is of Mexican heritage,” Trump explained to CNN’s Jake Tapper. “I’m building a wall, O.K.?”

Soon after, the speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, materialized to make a rare sort of public statement, actually agreeing with charges of racism against a candidate he still endorsed. “Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” he said.

Ryan then appeared on the “Kilmeade and Friends” radio show. “Are you saying that Donald Trump’s a racist?” Brian Kilmeade asked. “No, I’m not,” Ryan replied. “I’m saying the comment was. I don’t know what’s in his heart.”

Here, in a nutshell, is the public evolution of this word. Sure, Trump appeared to be suggesting a race-based test of judicial fitness. But the House speaker couldn’t speak to the state of Trump’s soul. He’s not God.

Trump, with his years of practice fielding such charges, had a different response. He seems to understand that charges of racism are essentially toothless, because the bar of proof is now so high that it’s impossible to clear. But he also understands that the seriousness of the accusation can have a paralyzing effect upon its target. So he coached his surrogates on how to respond. “The people asking the questions,” Trump told his proxies, “those are the racists. I would go at ’em.”

This is the end result of redefining racism to mean malice in one’s heart. Once whites moved the goal posts, anyone could be the victim of racism, and anyone could be racist. Activists opposing racism could be racist. President Obama casually mentioning that he, like Trayvon Martin, is black — this could be a deeply racist act. Advocates of busing programs or affirmative action could be racist. Minorities resentful over their treatment in America could be the real racists, the ones whose hearts insist on “making everything about race.” Al Sharpton is a racist. Beyoncé Knowles is a racist. Kanye West is definitely a racist.

A recent Justice Department investigation into the Baltimore Police Department unearthed rampant racial discrimination and routine violations of civil rights that specifically targeted the city’s black residents. And yet nonviolent movements like Black Lives Matter, which emerged three years ago to combat these exact issues, have instead been identified as bad actors, thugs and outside agitators — just last month, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York said, “When you say ‘black lives matter,’ that is inherently racist.”

Someone, after all, must be racist: More than half of white Americans now believe that they’re discriminated against as much as minorities. Who, then, is doing the discriminating?

It’s not that anyone denies that institutional racism once existed. But the belief now is that systemic racism is a national cancer that was excised long ago, in an operation so successful it didn’t even leave lasting effects. All that remains is individual hatred in the souls of the most monstrous among us — or else, depending on whom you ask, in vengeful minorities who want to nurse grievances and see whites suffer for the sins of past generations. Through the willful perversion of shared history, whites have been able to appropriate the victimhood of minorities and, in an audacious reversal, insist that an obvious thing isn’t real — otherwise known as gaslighting. And as in any case of sustained abuse, gaslighting is integral to institutional racism.

“Everybody’s walking on eggshells,” Clint Eastwood said, in a recent interview with Esquire. “We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist.”

Even delivered by an 86-year-old Hollywood tough guy, the absurdity of these words astounds. Here is a white man telling minorities what real racism looks like. He’s not alone, either: It’s common for white Americans to position themselves as the neutral arbiters of what is or is not racist and what other Americans are allowed to be angered by. Lo and behold, the answer is always the same — real institutional racism always ends up being something from the past, something dealt with, not an ongoing system of policy that afflicts minorities and profits white people to this day. Offer any objections, any other experience of the world, and the response you’ll get is the same one Eastwood offered in Esquire:

“Just [expletive] get over it.”

Buttler fight with Bangaldesh player, England 2nd ODI 2016

12

So nice

My choice

Allah Is All Powerful Show and Trust

My youtube post

Very nice

facebook

So nice

Ross is very Beautiful

What a Picture

what a beautiful see beach

dolphin working

one Moments

Watched & Enjoyed you and your circle

Very nice

So nice

Fighting 2 snake & beji

Very denjurius snake

Best choice for you

Beautiful Video

Philippines' Duterte says China, Russia supportive when he complained of U.S.

Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte said on Sunday he had received support from Russia and China when he complained to them about the United States, in another broadside that could test his increasingly fragile alliance with Washington.
Duterte said that during a meeting on the sidelines of a leaders' summit in Laos last month, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev had agreed with him when he railed against the United States.
"I met with Medvedev, I am revealing it to you now. I told him this is the situation, they are giving me a hard time, they are disrespecting me, they are shameless," Duterte said in a speech.
"He said 'that is really how the Americans are', he said 'we will help you'."
Duterte gave no further details about the nature of his complaints.
His ire toward the United States has intensified since U.S. President Barack Obama said he would raise concerns about his deadly war on drugs.
The White House canceled a meeting between them in Laos after Duterte had called Obama a "son of a bitch".
Duterte said on Sunday he had raised objections about the United States to China also.
"China said 'side with us, you won't benefit'," Duterte said. It was not immediately clear which Chinese official he was quoting, and when the remark was made.
Duterte has said repeatedly during recent, frequent speeches that he planned to open new alliances with Russia and China, particularly for trade and commerce, as part of his pursuit of an independent foreign policy.
Several commercial and diplomatic sources have confirmed to Reuters that a Philippine business delegation will accompany Duterte on a visit to Beijing from Oct. 19-21

Watched the video for Enjoying.........

Dear Audiance watching the sports.

Comminig soon............

প্রকাশিত হতে যাচ্ছে প্রাথমিক বিদ্যালয় শিক্ষক নিয়োগ বিজ্ঞপ্তি ও নতুন নিয়োগ পদ্ধতি…

প্রকাশিত হতে যাচ্ছে প্রাথমিক বিদ্যালয় শিক্ষক নিয়োগ বিজ্ঞপ্তি ও নতুন নিয়োগ পদ্ধতি…
.
পরীক্ষা পদ্ধতি: প্রাথমিক শিক্ষক নিয়োগ পরীক্ষার পদ্ধতি সম্পর্কে বিশেষজ্ঞরা বলেন, প্রাথমিক সহকারী শিক্ষক এবং প্রাক-প্রাথমিক সহকারী শিক্ষক নিয়োগ পরীক্ষার বিষয়বস্তু বিগত বছরের মতো থাকলেও এবার প্রশ্নের মান উন্নত হবে।
আগে লিখিত পরীক্ষায় মাধ্যমিক পর্যায় থেকে প্রশ্ন করা হলেও এবার উচ্চ মাধ্যমিক পর্যায় থেকেও প্রশ্ন আসবে। ৮০ নম্বরের লিখিত এবং ২০ নম্বরের মৌখিক পরীক্ষাসহ মোট ১০০ নম্বরের পরীক্ষা হবে। লিখিত পরীক্ষা নেওয়া হবে বহু নির্বাচনী বা এমসিকিউ পদ্ধতিতে।
প্রশ্ন করা হবে বাংলা, ইংরেজি, গণিত এবং সাধারণ জ্ঞান-এই চারটি বিষয়ে। প্রতিটি বিষয় থেকে ২০টি করে মোট ৮০টি এমসিকিউ প্রশ্ন থাকবে। প্রতিটি প্রশ্নের মান ১। সাবধান, নেগেটিভ মার্কিং মানবণ্টনে পরিবর্তন না এলেও চালু হচ্ছে নেগেটিভ মার্কিং। একটি ভুল উত্তরের জন্য কাটা যাবে ০.২৫ নম্বর। ফলে চারটি প্রশ্নের ভুল উত্তর দিলে ১ নম্বর কাটা যাবে। তাই নিশ্চিত না হয়ে কোনো প্রশ্নের উত্তর দেওয়া ঠিক হবে না। অনেক সময় সঠিক উত্তর জানা থাকলেও বৃত্ত ভরাটের সময় অসাবধানতাবশত ভুল উত্তর দাগিয়ে ফেলেন। একটুখানি সতর্ক হলেই এ ভুল এড়ানো যায়।
এমসিকিউ প্রশ্নের জন্য বরাদ্দ থাকবে ৮০ মিনিট। অর্থাৎ প্রতিটি প্রশ্নে পাওয়া যাবে এক মিনিট। যে প্রশ্নগুলো সহজেই উত্তর করা যায়, তা শুরুতেই দাগিয়ে ফেলতে হবে। কোনো প্রশ্নে বেশি সময় নষ্ট করা যাবে না, কঠিন প্রশ্নগুলো রেখে দিতে হবে পরে উত্তর করার জন্য। অনুমাননির্ভর উত্তরের চেয়ে না দাগানোই ভালো। তবে চারটি অপশনের মধ্যে দুটি ভুল উত্তর বের করতে পারলে বাকি দুটির মধ্যে একটি বেছে নেওয়া যেতে পারে। জানা প্রশ্নেও অনেকে কোনটির উত্তর করবেন, তা নিয়ে দ্বিধায় থাকেন অনেকে। প্রথমবার যেটি সঠিক বলে মনে হয়, উত্তর সঠিক হওয়ার সম্ভাবনা সেটির বেশি! বিগত বছরগুলোর প্রশ্ন সমাধান করলে কাজে দেবে। নিজেকে যাচাইয়ের জন্য বিসিএস প্রিলিমিনারি পরীক্ষার প্রশ্নও দেখতে পারেন।
বাংলা সাহিত্য ও ব্যাকরণ: উল্লেখযোগ্য কবি-সাহিত্যিকদের জীবন ও সাহিত্যকর্ম, বাংলা ভাষা ও সাহিত্যের ইতিহাস সম্পর্কে জানতে হবে। গল্প, কবিতা বা উপন্যাসের রচয়িতা থেকে প্রশ্ন বেশি আসে। ব্যাকরণ অংশে শব্দ, পদ, কারক- বিভক্তি, প্রকৃতি- প্রত্যয়, সন্ধি, সমাস, শুদ্ধ বানান পড়তে হবে। পারিভাষিক শব্দ, বিপরীত শব্দ, বাগধারা, এককথায় প্রকাশ থেকেও প্রশ্ন আসতে পারে। কৃষ্ণ অধিকারী জানান, সন্ধি, সমাস, কারক থেকে প্রতিবছরই প্রশ্ন থাকে, এগুলো প্রশ্নে একপলক দেখামাত্রই যেন উত্তর করা যায় সেভাবেই প্রস্তুতি নিতে হবে। এ জন্য বোর্ড প্রণীত নবম-দশম শ্রেণির ব্যাকরণ বইয়ের সব অধ্যায়ের পাঠ এবং উদাহরণ শিখতে পারলে ভালো হয়।
ইংরেজি: বেসিক গ্রামার সম্পর্কে স্পষ্ট ধারণা থাকতে হবে। পড়তে হবে Preposition, Antonym, Synonym, Parts of Speech, Tense, Spelling, Right forms of verb, Transformation, Voice, Narration । সাধারণত Spelling, Right forms of verb, Antonym, Synonym থেকে প্রশ্ন বেশি আসে। বিগত কয়েক বছরের শিক্ষক নিয়োগ পরীক্ষার প্রশ্নপত্র দেখলে বেশ ভালো ধারণা পাওয়া যাবে। চারটি Preposition থেকে শূন্যস্থানে. কোনটি বসবে, গ্রামারের বিচারে কোন বাক্যটি শুদ্ধ, কোনটি সঠিক Indirect Speech – এ ধরনের প্রশ্ন প্রায়ই আসে। অনুশীলনের জন্য প্রাথমিক শিক্ষক নিয়োগ গাইড, প্রফেসরস জব সল্যুশন এবং ভালো মানের গ্রামার বই পড়তে পারেন। আর খাতায় গুরুত্বপূর্ণ শব্দ লিখে চর্চা করলে কাজে লাগবে।
গণিত: গণিতের সমাধান বের করতে অনেকে বেশি সময় নিয়ে ফেলেন। এ ক্ষেত্রে সচেতন হতে হবে। পুরনো পাঠ্যক্রমের ষষ্ঠ থেকে অষ্টম ও নবম- দশম শ্রেণির গণিত বই অনুসরণ করতে হবে। দেখে যেতে হবে এইচএসসি পর্যায়ের বইও। সায়েন্টিফিক ক্যালকুলেটর নেওয়া যাবে না। সাধারণ ক্যালকুলেটর নেওয়া গেলেও সময় স্বল্পতার কারণে সব সময় ব্যবহার করতে যাওয়াটা বোকামি। গণিতের প্রস্তুতি এমনভাবে নিতে হবে যেন মুখে মুখেই অঙ্কের বেশির ভাগ সমাধান করে নেওয়া যায়, বারবার চর্চা করলেই এটা সম্ভব। সুদ-কষা, ঐকিক নিয়ম, লাভ-ক্ষতি, ভগ্নাংশ, ধারাপাত এবং বীজগণিতের প্রথম পর্যায়ের কিছু অঙ্ক থেকে প্রশ্ন আসতে পারে। অনেক সময় দশমিকের গুণ, ভাগ থাকে। জ্যামিতির সাধারণ সূত্র ও সংজ্ঞা থেকেও প্রশ্ন আসে।
সাধারণ জ্ঞান: সাম্প্রতিকে জোর বাংলাদেশের স্বাধীনতা, অভ্যুদয়ের ইতিহাস, জাতীয় বিষয়াবলি থেকে প্রশ্ন আসে। আন্তর্জাতিক অংশে দক্ষিণ এশিয়া এবং এশিয়া সম্পর্কিত প্রশ্ন বেশি দেখা যায়। খেলাধুলা, আন্তর্জাতিক সংস্থা, পুরস্কার, দিবস ইত্যাদি থেকে প্রশ্ন আসে। সাধারণ বিজ্ঞান ও প্রযুক্তিসংশ্লিষ্ট প্রশ্ন যেমন বিভিন্ন আবিষ্কার, রোগব্যাধি, বিভিন্ন খাদ্যগুণ, কম্পিউটার, তথ্য ও যোগাযোগ প্রযুক্তি থেকে প্রশ্ন আসতে পারে। সাধারণ জ্ঞানের প্রস্তুতির জন্য আজকের বিশ্ব, এমপিথ্রি, নতুন বিশ্ব পড়তে পারেন কৃষ্ণ অধিকারী বলেন, সাম্প্রতিক সময়ে বাংলাদেশ থেকে প্রশ্ন বেশি থাকে। বিশেষত এক বছরের জাতীয় ও আন্তর্জাতিক বিশ্বে ঘটে যাওয়া ঘটনাগুলোকে বেশি গুরুত্ব দিতে হবে। এ জন্য পড়তে হবে সাধারণ জ্ঞানবিষয়ক মাসিক কারেন্ট অ্যাফেয়ার্স বা কারেন্ট ওয়ার্ল্ড।
মৌখিক পরীক্ষা: লিখিত পরীক্ষায় উত্তীর্ণদেরই শুধু মৌখিক পরীক্ষায় ডাকা হবে। মৌখিক পরীক্ষায় থাকবে ২০ নম্বর। একাডেমিক ফলাফল বা শিক্ষাগত যোগ্যতার ওপর থাকবে ৫ নম্বর। এক্সট্রা কারিকুলাম (নাচ, গান, অভিনয়, আবৃত্তি) এর ওপর বরাদ্দ থাকবে ৫ নম্বর। বাকি ১০ নম্বর থাকবে সাধারণ জ্ঞানের ওপর। মৌখিক পরীক্ষায় সাধারণ জ্ঞানের জন্য প্রার্থীর নিজ জেলার থানা বা উপজেলার আয়তন, জনসংখ্যা, সংস্কৃতি, জেলার ইতিহাস, রাজনীতি ইত্যাদি সম্পর্কে ধারণা থাকলে ভালো করা যাবে।

Germany News

German Chancellor Angela Merkel arrives to sign a book of condolence for former Israeli President Shimon Peres at the embassy of Israel in Berlin, Germany, September 30, 2016. REUTERS/Michael Kappeler/POOL

USA Today

There is, Earnhardt said, no offseason deadline when the team would require him to be deemed fully recovered to resume driving duties in 2017.
“If there is,” he said. “I don’t know it.”
Earnhardt said he enjoyed being back in his workplace, albeit in a different capacity. While he has been assured his presence has been heartening to his team, he is more concerned about taking steps back to the job where he contributes most.
“My crew chiefs and all the management at HMS tell me that it’s good for them, so I like being around them,” he said. “We’re all good friends, so it’s good to see ‘em. But they’re working, too, so I try to stay out of the way. But I want to be here, I guess, just to kind of see what they’re doing, what they’re dealing with, so when I get back in the car it’s not so foreign, I don’t have a lot of catching up to.”
Earnhardt, 41, said walking the grid before Xfinity Series qualifying that while his vision has improved, he continues to struggle with balance, a condition heightened by plying the busy garage and all the stimulus that comes with being NASCAR’s most popular and noticeable driver.

We Can Enjoy Our Life this Cetagory.

So Nice

Just for you.

Allah is all powerful. I am believed this. watching the video clip for your believer. please, watched.

This is my Future Dreams. Dear Audience, Please Pray for me.

This is My First Blogspots.